ARIM and the State Map 360 as a Framework for Practice Recording and Follow Up

Introduction

ARIM connects the selection of a practice with observation and later review. The State Map 360 supplies a representation of the person's experience relative to a reference [2, 3]. The method is described here in its source-defined form. Its immediate contribution is an organized sequence and record, not a validated measure of consciousness or proof of a clinical intervention.

The four phases

Abastecimiento selects a resource or practice relevant to an agreed objective. Reparacion addresses reorganization and perceived load within the framework. Instalacion incorporates a new routine into everyday activity. Mantenimiento repeats observation, reviews stability and adjusts the practice [2, 3]. The Spanish phase names preserve the ARIM acronym. Repair in this sequence is methodological language and does not establish tissue repair. The advanced class provides a hypothetical everyday application: choose a short pause, identify a demand to simplify, connect the pause to closing a computer and record subsequent experience. It is not reported as a completed study.

Indices and domains

Anchoring refers to perceived presence, stability and connection; disrooting to perceived dispersion, disconnection or instability; flow to continuity of activity in the model. The classes require independent anchoring and disrooting ratings [2]. One must not be computed as 100 minus the other. The advanced class proposes direct 0-100 self-ratings [3]; earlier references to software-derived scores require a distinct calculation specification. A twenty-point change is a scale difference, not automatically a twenty-percent improvement. Domain names such as water, air, matter, biological, observer and sleep or information identify areas for description and require their own variables. They do not validate physical cross-system connections.

Reproducible follow up

Record the date, situation, objective, exact question, response source, selected practice, duration, context and intended next observation. The teaching sequence includes before, immediately after, next day, seven-day and twenty-one-day observations [2]. The advanced class also proposes three baseline days as a teaching exercise [3]. These windows organize observation and are not validated transformation thresholds. Retain changes in circumstances, incomplete records, stability, no change and unfavorable experiences. Keep the fifteen-act stage separate from the three indices; an act number is not a score.

Evidence provenance and measurement development

The classes distinguish measured, reported, inferred and hypothetical information. A self-rating remains reported when entered in software; a model-derived summary does not become a physiological measurement. An actual instrument record needs its device, variable and conditions. Begin evaluation with cognitive interviews on the wording of each question. Then assess recording burden, missingness and interpretation across contexts. Later work could examine stability where no change is expected and relationships with independently selected measures. Prospective assessment literature informs the recording strategy [4] but does not validate these new scales. The source-defined category cutoffs should not be treated as clinical thresholds.

Discussion and conclusion

A conceptual map can make experience reviewable while still requiring measurement development. Sources differ in the broader program's placement of the Great Observer; this draft does not reconcile the full fifteen-act sequence by inference. The operational ARIM procedure can be studied separately while the author resolves that historical mapping. Potential limitations include instructional effects, overlap among terms and confusion between reported and computed scores. The next contribution is a fixed record and testing of comprehension, followed by appropriately designed comparative research.

Conceptual sources and lineage

Neuroakashico®, el gran observador and De Akashico a Neuroakashico situate the proposed method within the author's broader practice of observation and reflective interpretation [5, 6]. Their role here is conceptual and historical. Validation of the State Map as a measurement instrument remains a separate empirical task.

References

1. Lara AS. Neuroconsciousness Journal Editorial March 2027. English design and manuscript review proof. Version 2; November 2026. Unpublished development dossier; relevant article identified in text.
2. Lara AS. Expandia Clase Espanol. 19-slide teaching presentation; October 2026. Slides 4-18. Internal development material.
3. Lara AS. Expandia Avanzado Clase 2. 24-slide teaching presentation; October 2026. Slides 6-22. Internal development material.
4. Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2008;4:1-32. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415
5. Lara AS. Neuroakashico®, el gran observador: Un avance en neurociencias. Balboa Press; 2020. ISBN 9781982255046. https://www.balboapress.com/en/bookstore/bookdetails/783359-neuroakashico-el-gran-observador
6. Lara AS. De Akashico a Neuroakashico: El nacimiento de la Luz Ilimitada. Ana Silvia Lara Publishing LLC; 2026. Author-supplied paperback manuscript, pp. 190-195.